Ask Question
23 January, 02:40

Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v Chicago

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 23 January, 04:34
    0
    The correct answer to this open question is the following.

    Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v Chicago ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers