A company that owned a tract of land believed to be rich in mineral deposits contracted with a licensed excavator for the removal of soil from the property and delivery of the soil to the company's laboratories. While one of the excavator's trucks was on the way to the laboratory, the rear gate broke loose, dumping three tons of soil onto the highway. A motorist who was driving a short but safe distance behind the truck was unable to stop in time and collided with the soil, causing her serious injury. The rear gate had been negligently secured by one of the excavator's employees. If the motorist sues the company for his injuries and does not prevail, what is the most likely reason?
+1
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “A company that owned a tract of land believed to be rich in mineral deposits contracted with a licensed excavator for the removal of soil ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Home » Social Studies » A company that owned a tract of land believed to be rich in mineral deposits contracted with a licensed excavator for the removal of soil from the property and delivery of the soil to the company's laboratories.