Fact-finding could be considered inferior to mediation or arbitration for all of the following reasons except: Multiple Choice a) It does not guarantee a resolution like arbitration. b) It does not assist the negotiators in their attempt to reach an agreement. c) It does not allow the parties to reevaluate their positions. d) Public pressure is often not enough to encourage the parties to settle.

Question

Social Studies

Catherine Vega

29 October, 17:16

Fact-finding could be considered inferior to mediation or arbitration for all of the following reasons except: Multiple Choice a) It does not guarantee a resolution like arbitration. b) It does not assist the negotiators in their attempt to reach an agreement. c) It does not allow the parties to reevaluate their positions. d) Public pressure is often not enough to encourage the parties to settle.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Strickland · Answer 1

C.

Explanation:

Fact finding engages parameters uncontrollable by both parties, in which both parties wouldn't know the extent to which their position is affirmed over the other.