g Each individual criminal justice professional has a personal set of ethics, which plays a crucial role in discretionary decision-making. Given this fact, under what circumstances might the use of discretion by criminal justice professionals not be in society's best interests?

The overview of the problem is listed throughout the explanation segment below.

Explanation:

Professionals throughout the field of criminology possess stylistic. Some are much more concerned with making money, and others are more successful in forming equality as well as humanity throughout a social structure.

Even in the criminal system, where the practitioner is much more motivated by money than it is detrimental to society. From the history of alleged aggression, whenever a criminal law provider attempts to rescue or defend the perpetrator, it becomes very detrimental to society. Furthermore, the intended murder would be against the common interest as well. There are indeed instances where even the perpetrators are involved in violence. It is indeed a huge political curse, genuinely. In a somewhat scenario, the law enforcement professional could perhaps take the necessary steps never to operate for both the betterment of people on numerous occasions including its perpetrator. There are several other experts in the field of criminology who preserve oppression as well as discrimination. I just want the ones he fears to be disciplined. They occasionally consider taking unethical tactics to do just that. But this is damaging to society. Once again, certain criminology experts are selling profits to either the wealthy. So they're not allowed to do that for the benefit of society.