Ask Question
19 March, 00:08

Your employer says that the flood in 2010 was a 100-year flood and the flood in 2009 was a 200-year flood so it will be at least 300 years before we see another flood like them. Is your employer correct?

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 19 March, 04:00
    0
    No, employer is not correct.

    Explanation:

    The two floods happened year after year. which means that the hundred year gap between the 200year flood and 100year flood turned to a year gap. This one year gap was a hundred year gap. Hence, the occurrence is random.
  2. 19 March, 04:08
    0
    Answer: NO. The employer is wrong.

    Explanation: A 100-year flood is a statistical term that explains that a flood has a 1 in 100 chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. This term is used for insurance purposes. Because there was a 100 year flood recently doesn't guarantee that there will be another in the near future. Floods doesn't have to follow any regular pattern.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Your employer says that the flood in 2010 was a 100-year flood and the flood in 2009 was a 200-year flood so it will be at least 300 years ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers