Brett

12 June, 13:42

Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument?

A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics.

B. When judges are elected there they can focus more time on reviewing law.

C. Judges are more accountable to the people and what they think is just when they are elected

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument? A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics. B. When judges are ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

The Revolutionary War had wrenching effects on the American economy. What economic problems became especially acute during wartime? How did the states and the Second continental Congress attempt to address them? B

The demographics, lifestyles, and social values of a society determine the firm's a. economic environment. b. technological environment. c. political environment. d. social environment

What was the most important factor in the settlement of South Asia? A. The settlements were close to religious temples. B. There was enough rainfall to support agriculture. C. There was enough wind to allow boats to sail. D.

The three major subtraditions forming the common legal tradition are:

Who won the presidential election of 1860? A. Stephen Douglas B. Abraham Lincoln C. Jefferson Davis D. John C. Breckinridge

New Questions in Social Studies

What are some challenges (ancient) Roman woman faced?

Described how Brian was rescued?

How did the Huns effected Rome

Perspective attempts to explain one's personality in terms of their behavioral traits. A. Trait B. Personality C. Behavioral

One way to stimulate people's thinking so that they become more committed to their positions is to