Brett

12 June, 13:42

Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument?

A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics.

B. When judges are elected there they can focus more time on reviewing law.

C. Judges are more accountable to the people and what they think is just when they are elected

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument? A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics. B. When judges are ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

The distinguishing element between intentional torts and negligent torts is: a. intent. b. level of damages. c. causation. d. All of the above are distinctions.

Why was the Niger River important

In 2002 the United States had a GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of $10.5 trillion. What does that mean? A. It is the amount that the United States owned to other countries B.

Examples of an income deduction (career)

On Election Day, voters for president are really voting for ... ? A) speaker of the house B) president C) electors D) senators

New Questions in Social Studies

You're the network administrator for a large bean-bag chair company. You are presenting to your supervisor several reasons to make use of cloud computing for handling data processing. Which answer would be a valid benefit of using cloud computing?

What is one characteristic of mercantilism from the perspective of the colony

Explaining the differences between Karl Marx and Max Weber's explanation of social stratification.

What was the name of Dracula's sidekick?

In the realm of secular architecture, the ___, known as the keep in England or the donjon in France, stood in the middle of a courtyard surrounded by walls.