Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

effective secondary source document

too biased for historical evidence

too focused for historical evidence

unreliable narrative source

useful primary source document

Question

Social Studies

Aiden

28 December, 20:27

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

effective secondary source document

too biased for historical evidence

too focused for historical evidence

unreliable narrative source

useful primary source document

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Arnav Hopkins · Answer 1

It would be an "a. effective secondary source document" that best describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event, since the information as had time to "settle"--although of course this doesn't automatically mean that the chart is "effective".

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?effective secondary source documenttoo biased for historical evidencetoo focused for historical evidenceunreliable narrative sourceuseful primary source document

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

effective secondary source document

too biased for historical evidence

too focused for historical evidence

unreliable narrative source

useful primary source document