Ask Question
28 December, 20:27

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

effective secondary source document

too biased for historical evidence

too focused for historical evidence

unreliable narrative source

useful primary source document

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 28 December, 21:13
    0
    It would be an "a. effective secondary source document" that best describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event, since the information as had time to "settle"--although of course this doesn't automatically mean that the chart is "effective".
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event? effective secondary source document too biased for ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers