Aydin Dudley

11 July, 09:22

Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?

No single branch of government would have too much power.

The president should have more power than the other branches.

Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.

Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers? No single branch of government would have too much power. The president should have ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

During the 1970s how much of prime time television programming was dedicated to crime-and-justice stories?

Why does English often serve as a lingua franca throughout South and Southeast Asia?

For a law to pass in the texas legislature it must be voted on by

What is the likely reason why earth has a layered structure?

What do many of political conflicts in south asia have in common

New Questions in Social Studies

If objects at the same distance suddenly decreased in mass, the gravitational force between them would.

The strategy in which a judge orders a convicted offender to prison for a short time but then suspends the remainder of the sentence in favor of probation is called

Which of these policies is considered to be a comprehensive health policy?

Which of the following is correct regarding strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities? A To be characterized as an abnormally dangerous activity, the activity must be considered abnormally dangerous in every communityB Strict liability

Who is the prime minester of India?