In response to peer review, a scientific journal might choose not to publish a paper submitted by a scientist. which of the following is a reason why a paper might be rejected for publication?

Here are the choices for the given question above:

A. The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.

B. The accompanying photographs were not sensational enough.

C. The opening sentence was incapable of capturing a reader's interest.

D. The reported discovery had no potential commercial value.

Well the answer is A. The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.