BeFriends Corporation uses the trademark of Community Life Inc., a social media site, as a meta tag without Community Life's permission. This may be permissible a. if the appropriating site has nothing to do with the meta tag. b. if the use constitutes trademark infringement. c. under no circumstances. d. if the two sites appear in the same search engine results.

Question

Business

Dahlia

27 November, 01:12

BeFriends Corporation uses the trademark of Community Life Inc., a social media site, as a meta tag without Community Life's permission. This may be permissible a. if the appropriating site has nothing to do with the meta tag. b. if the use constitutes trademark infringement. c. under no circumstances. d. if the two sites appear in the same search engine results.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Boo · Answer 1

This may be permissible " if the use constitutes trademark infringement". Answer: Option B

Explanation:

A form of intellectual property composed of a distinctive symbol, logo, or phrase distinguishing goods or services of a specific source from those of others, while trademarks used to distinguish services are generally referred to as brand marks, this is understood as a "trademark". Infringement of the mark is a breach of the exclusive rights connected to a mark without the approval of the proprietor of the mark or any licensee. Many companies misguide people by using approximately similar tags or logo to attract customers toward their products.

Alejandro Phillips · Answer 2

BeFriends Corporation uses the trademark of Community Life Inc. a social media site, as a meta tag without Community Life's permission. This may be permissible (a) if the appropriating site has nothing to do with the meta tag.

Explanation:

The using of the Meta Tag is Permissible because the trade mark name is being used for a different product or service and it does not involve any kind of trade mark infringement.