Ask Question
3 June, 22:54

A hunger-relief organization has earmarked between $2 million and $3.5 million (inclusive) for aid to two African countries, Country A and Country B. Country A is to receive between $1 million and $1.25 million (inclusive), and Country B is to receive at least $1 million. It has been estimated that each dollar spent in Country A will yield an effective return of $0.50, whereas a dollar spent in Country B will yield an effective return of $0.90. How should the aid be allocated if the money, in millions, is to be utilized most effectively according to these criteria?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 3 June, 23:25
    0
    It is clear that the yield in country B is higher than that of country A, although country A could sometimes receive more money, since it moves in a range, while country B always receives the same amount, the key factor is to measure the cost of performance that each country has, that is, just knowing the performance is not enough to make a decision, it is necessary to make a social assessment of projects that although not financial should be evaluated from the costs of generating such profitability.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “A hunger-relief organization has earmarked between $2 million and $3.5 million (inclusive) for aid to two African countries, Country A and ...” in 📙 Business if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers