Ask Question
10 May, 00:15

Michelle and deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. which of their arguments is most valid?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 10 May, 01:39
    0
    I believe the choices from this question are:

    a. Michelle's claim that breastfed babies are ill less often because breast milk has the mother's antibodies in it.

    b. Deana's assertion that bottlefed babies are less likely to have diarrhea and constipation.

    c. Michelle's argument that breastfed babies' psychological development is enhanced.

    d. Deana's belief that bottlefed babies make the transition to solid foods more easily.

    The answer is:

    a. Michelle's claim that breastfed babies are ill less often because breast milk has the mother's antibodies in it.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Michelle and deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. which of their arguments is most valid? ...” in 📙 Business if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers