Ask Question
16 October, 15:47

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 16 October, 17:34
    0
    The characters are talking animals. Any other option would be logical and easy to explain, but talking animals don't exist unless you consider a parrot. Nonetheless, the other options are logical and realistic while the last option is not at all realistic. Most children's books are not realistic.
  2. 16 October, 18:33
    0
    The characters are talking animals
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this story was written for children? The story is set in a forest. The battle was won by a ...” in 📙 English if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers