In Tinker v. Des Moines, why was it considered protected speech for students to wear armbands?

a. Their action did not negatively influence other students.

b. Their action was not disruptive.

c. Their action occurred off school grounds.

d. Their action was political speech.

Question

Adrian Conrad

8 October, 20:58

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Kendrick Davenport · Answer 1

The answer is B their action was never disruptive

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why was it considered protected speech for students to wear armbands?a. Their action did not negatively influence other students.b. Their action was not disruptive.c. Their action occurred off school grounds.d. Their action was political speech.