Ask Question
18 November, 18:13

Jeremy is trying to explain why a triangle with side lengths 35, 30, 60 is not a right triangle. His explanation is shown below. Step 1: 35 squared + 30 squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 2: (35 + 30) squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 3: 65 squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 4: 4,225 not-equals 3,600 Which best describes Jeremy's explanation? Jeremy's explanation is accurate. Jeremy's explanation is inaccurate. He wrote the leg lengths in the incorrect order in step 1. Jeremy's explanation is inaccurate. He incorrectly combined terms in step 2. Jeremy's explanation is inaccurate. He multiplied incorrectly in step 4.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 18 November, 18:41
    0
    He incorrectly combined terms in step 2

    Step-by-step explanation:

    In Step 2, you can't combine 30² + 35² into (30 + 35) ² so the answer is "He incorrectly combined terms in step 2".
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Jeremy is trying to explain why a triangle with side lengths 35, 30, 60 is not a right triangle. His explanation is shown below. Step 1: 35 ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers