Ask Question
16 February, 06:10

Explain why the year 1800 was not a leap year, even though years divisible by four are normally considered to be leap years.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 16 February, 07:36
    0
    Answer and Explanation:

    The year which is directly divided by 400 will be a leap year and by 4 for example 2000 1600 are leap year because they are directly divided by 400 and the year 1700 and 1800 although they are divided by 4 but not by 400 so they are not leap year, This is the reason even 1800 is divided by 4 but not a leap year
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Explain why the year 1800 was not a leap year, even though years divisible by four are normally considered to be leap years. ...” in 📙 Physics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers