Ask Question
5 August, 09:18

What do you think the U. S. and NATO should do

with regards to Afghanistan and Pakistan? Make sure to include why. 5-6 sentences. (The Taliban and the US invasion of Afghanistan)

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 5 August, 12:54
    0
    India and Pakistan have highly disparate goals for Afghanistan, and they thus undertake very

    different activities there. Delhi has striven to bolster the government in Kabul and integrate

    Afghanistan into wider regional political and economic structures. This has not been done out

    of any sense of altruism. By strengthening Afghanistan, India advances its own national security objectives-namely, eliminating a critical safe haven for terrorists who have attacked India

    and continue plotting to do so in the future, projecting power throughout South Asia (and

    beyond), and gaining access to Central Asian trade and energy resources. Although Delhi's

    goals for Afghanistan certainly involve minimizing Islamabad's influence there, the government's overall policy is geared primarily to advancing India's broader domestic and regional

    interests independently of its rivalry with Pakistan.

    In contrast, Pakistan's goals for Afghanistan are mainly-although not exclusively-

    India-centric and focus primarily on undermining Delhi's influence in Afghanistan. Islamabad

    seeks a weak Kabul government dominated by a pliant, supportive Taliban so that Pakistan can

    maintain "strategic depth" against an Indian invasion, guarantee safe haven for Islamist proxies that it supports, prevent Delhi from projecting power in South Asia, and obstruct India's

    ability to support separatists in the Pakistani province of Balochistan. In Islamabad's Afghanistan calculus, protecting itself against Indian encroachment takes precedence over pursuing

    Pakistan's broader geopolitical and economic goals. Part of the reason for this strategic orientation is the preeminent decisionmaking role played by Pakistan's military, which emphasizes

    security matters over virtually all other elements of foreign policy. So long as India is viewed as

    an existential threat, and so long as the military plays a central role in setting Pakistani policy,

    it is unlikely that there will be a fundamental shift in this policy bias. 1

    With its military-dominated decisionmaking apparatus focused on internal security concerns and on keeping other powers from exerting influence in Afghanistan, Pakistan has little

    of positive value to offer Afghanistan or other countries in the region. Pakistan is not positioned well to boost trade, and it has demonstrated little willingness to take steps designed to

    improve the lives of ordinary Afghans. By contrast, India's democratic polity, institutionalized decisionmaking processes, relative internal stability, apolitical military, large consumer

    base, and growing economy make it a far more palatable partner for Kabul. Thus, although

    Hamid Karzai's government has clearly been prepared to play India and Pakistan against one

    another-often effectively-it has also taken explicit steps to distance itself from Islamabad

    while embracing Delhi's cooperation and assist
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What do you think the U. S. and NATO should do with regards to Afghanistan and Pakistan? Make sure to include why. 5-6 sentences. (The ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers