Ask Question
14 January, 15:12

Should presidents be limited to two terms in office? why or why not

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 14 January, 15:47
    0
    The reason that they were was because of FDR famously holding four terms in office, presumably because it would be a poor example for a democratic nation to have a single elected leader for such a long period of time. There are probably multiple arguments both for and against allowing multiple terms in office, however.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Should presidents be limited to two terms in office? why or why not ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers